Bryton Gardia R300L review: A new challenger in the rear radar category comes to market

Is Garmin losing control of the category it invented?

Bryton Gardia R300L
(Image: © Josh Ross)

Cyclingnews Verdict

The Bryton Gardia R300L looks great on paper but it’s still a work in progress. If Bryton continues to update it at the pace they’ve been on pre-release then this could finally be the long-awaited Garmin RLT515 replacement. As it currently stands, it’s not all that usable as a radar so you’d have to buy it as a rear light and hope it improves

Pros

  • +

    USB-C charging

  • +

    17-hour battery in day flash mode

  • +

    Comparatively budget price for a radar unit

  • +

    Remembers the last mode

Cons

  • -

    Struggles with multiple cars in close proximity

  • -

    Lots of phantom cars

You can trust Cyclingnews Our experts spend countless hours testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

As of today, the Bryton Gardia L300 makes it to market as a new competitor in the rear radar category. For those unfamiliar, rear radar is one of the things I will happily tell people is an absolute game changer. Having your bike computer tell you that there is a car behind you before it's an issue will change the way you ride. In the city, it can be a mirror and in the country, it means you can take the whole road while you casually chat worry-free with a riding partner. Until recently though only Garmin offered a product. 

Tech specs: Bryton Gardia R300L rear light

Price: €129.95 / $129.95

Size: 97 x 20.9 x 40mm

Water rating: IPX7

Wireless Protocol: ANT+/BLE

Burntime: 8hr/20lm high solid, 12hr/5lm low solid, 10hr/12lm group ride, 17hr/12lm night flash, 17hr/73lm day flash, 24hr radar only 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Testing scorecard and notes
Design and mountingThe mount is better than the Garmin mount but because it’s not compatible you have no access to third party options. Unfortunately the core function of seeing cars doesn’t work very well.3/10
Light qualityThere are better rear lights but none of them have radar functionality.8/10
Control SchemeIt remembers the last setting but otherwise works the same as the other options. Some indication of what mode you were in would be an upgrade for all of them.8/10
Battery life and chargingAlthough I was unable to verify the claims, the specs say it has better battery life than Garmin. Even with USB-C charging though, it doesn’t fast charge and is limited to 5v. 8/10
ValueIf/when the core functionality works then this could be category leading. Right now you are paying for only a rear light and that makes it not a great deal5/10
OverallRow 5 - Cell 1 64%
Josh Ross

Josh hails from the Pacific Northwest of the United States but would prefer riding through the desert than the rain. He will happily talk for hours about the minutiae of cycling tech but also has an understanding that most people just want things to work. He is a road cyclist at heart and doesn't care much if those roads are paved, dirt, or digital. Although he rarely races, if you ask him to ride from sunrise to sunset the answer will be yes. Height: 5'9" Weight: 140 lb. Rides: Salsa Warbird, Cannondale CAAD9, Enve Melee, Look 795 Blade RS, Priority Continuum Onyx