From bad to worse as women’s Tour of Guangxi offers no live broadcast
Race organisers ignore own Women’s WorldTour race, may face demotion
Last Friday, this writer pointed out the differences in broadcast quality between the women’s Tour of Chongming Island and the men’s Tour of Guangxi, highlighting the lower standard applied to the women’s race. However, the disregard with which the organisers of the Tour of Guangxi treat their own women’s race is on a level that would almost be comical if it weren’t so saddening.
Getting to see only the final 19 kilometres of stage 2 of the Tour of Chongming Island wasn’t ideal – but overall, the quality and length of that race’s live broadcasts were alright. But there was no broadcast whatsoever of the women’s one-day race, a neglect made even more glaring by comparison to the six-day men’s stage race that enjoyed between 70 and 90 minutes of live coverage each day.
To be fair, this situation hasn’t become worse since the last edition of the race in 2019 since the women’s race wasn’t broadcast then either – but it also hasn’t become any better on the return of the Tour of Guangxi from a three-year hiatus due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The forested karst mountains south of Guilin offered a beautiful backdrop for the men’s final stage and would have made for an equally attractive broadcast of the women’s race, but no live footage was produced. And unlike 2019, there wasn’t even a replay of the women’s sprint finish included in the men’s broadcast.
When other Women’s WorldTour races did not offer a live broadcast in the past, they did take the opportunity to offer frequent live updates e.g. via Twitter. However, while the Tour of Guangxi Twitter account regularly sent out updates on the men’s race, it never even mentioned that there was a women’s race before or during the race, only tweeting the top three and the winners of the various secondary classifications after the finish. Were it not for the UCI’s Women’s WorldTour updates on its own website, there would not have been any live information at all.
What’s more, the website for the women’s event saw its last update shortly after the 2019 edition when a photo of the finishing sprint was added. The race date given front and centre is still that of the 2018 edition, the list of participating teams is a strange mix of teams from 2017, 2018, and 2019, and the race results page only shows the 2017 result. Almost the only redeeming feature is that the full results were available very soon after the race finished.
Needless to say, this treatment not only knocks off the bar of the UCI-mandated minimum 45 minutes of live coverage for a Women’s WorldTour race, it doesn’t even touch the bar as it passes far, far below. The regulating body for world cycling must make strong demands to the organisers for them to keep their WWT spot for 2024, and the case for demoting the race after not complying with the Women’s WorldTour’s minimum standards is a very strong one.
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
Lukas Knöfler started working in cycling communications in 2013 and has seen the inside of the scene from many angles. Having worked as press officer for teams and races and written for several online and print publications, he has been Cyclingnews’ Women’s WorldTour correspondent since 2018.