Clinching the win at Flanders with cadence, gears and experience
Mathieu van der Poel (Alpecin-Fenix) celebrates the victory at Tour of Flanders while Tadej Pogacar (UAE Team Emirates) digests the disappointment of fourth(Image credit: Getty Images Sport)
Tadej Pogačar impressed me for 270 kilometres at the Tour of Flanders. Mathieu van der Poel impressed me for 300 metres. Badass – that’s the word I’d use to describe it.
Tadej was impressive on the Koppenberg, impressive on the Kwaremont, impressive on the Taaienberg, impressive on the Paterberg. Mathieu, on the other hand, did nothing special. He was there in the right moments, he followed, but did he attack? No.
It’s all about cadence, and it’s all because they slowed right down – they were going so slow! Look at Van der Poel’s cadence and then look at Pogačar’s.
Mathieu accelerates in Mathieu style. He has this ability to accelerate with lower gears and a higher cadence, and then he can shift up through the gears.
Tadej was in almost the same gear the whole time, and the whole time a big gear. He maybe didn’t have enough max power to accelerate with that gear.
If I had to guess, I’d say Mathieu was in the 53/19 and Pogačar was in the 53/14. It’s little things like that. When you lose speed, you have to be ready with certain gears – gears that help you and don’t block you.
Get The Leadout Newsletter
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
We can’t forget that this was Tadej’s first time at Flanders. Everyone was laughing a little, saying ah ‘Nibali tried it, Valverde tried it’. Well, today he proved those people wrong and showed that he is at least capable of winning the Tour of Flanders.
Still, the reason why he didn’t win was perhaps his inexperience. Tadej has some sprint qualities, but not against Mathieu. He’s more of a stage racer, whereas Mathieu is a one-day racer and will simply have sprinted far more times and in far more scenarios.
A sprint at the end of the Tour of Flanders is not a normal sprint. It’s a big poker game and you cannot really plan for it. Plus, it’s certainly not a normal sprint when you slow right down and you have two guys coming with speed from behind. I don’t think Tadej quite realised how fast they were coming, and he wasn’t able to make that acceleration from a slower speed, which is why they got the jump and boxed him in.
It’s sad and disappointing for him but, like I said, it was badass from Van der Poel. I don’t mean that in a bad way. He wouldn’t even hurt a fly. But in a big race like this, when shit hits the fan, you need to be a warrior. These races don’t give you any excuses.
He now has two Ronde Van Vlaanderen titles to his name. He can get three and he can get four. It depends on so many things, but I would have no problem if he is the one to reach the fourth Flanders – wow, chapeau, the sport lives for things like that.
Kasper Asgreen and Christophe Laporte during the race (Image credit: Tim de WaeleGetty Images)
The absence of Wout van Aert changed the race but, I have to say, the way Jumbo-Visma rode in his absence was kind of disappointing. I know Laporte crashed but still, he got back in. Benoot, I don’t know. They ended up in ninth and 13th – on the one hand you can say that’s not bad, but then you look at the expectations on that team, the way they’ve been racing, and it’s clear they didn’t deliver.
I don’t know if it was a lack of legs or a lack of mental strength. They have been dominating everything but here they didn’t do much at all. Nathan Van Hooydonck went quite early in quite an interesting breakaway, but after that, not much.
When you can ride like that for Wout van Aert you expect better when it comes to riding for themselves, but it’s always hard when your leader and the big favourite is out. Mentally, I think it was hard for them to adjust.
QuickStep-AlphaVinyl also had another bad race. This is just not their spring. I don’t call it a terrible spring, because when you look at the problems they’ve had with illness and injuries, what can they do? Asgreen had a mechanical on the Koppenberg but he said that was irrelevant and he wasn’t able to follow Pogačar.
Chapeau for his honesty. He wasn’t good enough and he said it. He was honest and I always have respect for that. These guys are human at the end of the day.
I’ll tell you who weren’t disappointing: Groupama-FDJ. There were amazing – individually and collectively. Valentin Madouas was the only one apart from Van der Poel who was able to follow Pogačar on the Koppenberg, and Stefan Küng put in an amazing performance behind. The whole team upped their game and were more than the sum of their parts.
All in all, it was a superb race. It was a Hitchcock – suspense until the very end. Everyone thought it was finished but it was a reminder that it’s only finished on the finish line and not before.
Apart from that, what a crowd. The fans were back and there must have been a million people on the road from Antwerp to Oudenaarde. It was a crazy atmosphere. The organisers, volunteers, supporters, everyone deserves a pat on the back. It was an amazing festival of cycling.
Fabian Cancellara is an ex-professional cyclist who raced from 2001 to 2016 for Mapei, Fassa Bortolo, CSC and Trek. One of a select trio of riders to have won Paris-Roubaix and the Tour of Flanders three times, alongside arch rival Tom Boonen and Johan Museeuw, he is the only racer who can add the Strade Bianche triple to that glittering statistic – first across the line in Siena at four year intervals between 2008 and 2016."Spartacus" was also a formidable time trialist: four times world champion, twice Olympic champion, his final race as a professional cyclist came in the TT at the Rio Olympics in 2016, where he triumphed over second-placed Tom Dumoulin by a staggering 47 seconds. Alongside various business interests – and being a Cyclingnews columnist, of course – Cancellara is a founder of the Tudor Pro Cycling team, currently racing at UCI Pro Team level.
